Saturday, August 22, 2020

The Burning Fire Tree WIth Roses and Candy Essay Example For Students

The Burning Fire Tree WIth Roses and Candy Essay Thompson Arcella Jefferson-Newts first love Jefferson Cavanaugh-Judge of Cherokee Flats, business of Sarah Winger Marcus Savage-Newts enemy Silas Newhall-Accused killer of Jake Kiner Other Characters III. Setting Place: Cherokee Flats, Kansas Time: 1920s Description: A little Southern town with bursting summers and freezing winters IV. Plot This epic is about Newt Winger and his family during his years in Cherokee Flats. It tells about his (Newts) first love, first foe, and his first experiences with death and prejudice. He even spares a white keeps an eye on life, despitestrong and that some how it could be relieved however no, no way. We will compose a custom paper on The Burning Fire Tree WIth Roses and Candy explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now He discovers that as he gets slaughtered with the untrusting look in Charlies eyes. Tragically, before Charlie could get to John, John got to Andy, and Andy was executed. Charlie was stunned. She couldnt accept that her dad was dead. Out of those years that she and he had gone out and ran from the administration, it was finished; she no longerBibliography:I didnt use juice

Friday, August 21, 2020

Notions of Differences in Nervous Conditions by Tsitsi Dangarembga

Distinguish theâ three thoughts of differencesâ mentioned in the connected records in Nervous Conditionsâ and show how they identify with issues of personality. Three ideas of contrasts : 1. The demonstration of veiling 2. The utilization of quietness 3. The topic of subjectivity 1)The demonstration of veiling will bring about loss of way of life as the individuals decide to stay persecuted by the supposed increasingly predominant individuals. These individuals decided to remain hidden by the more unrivaled and battling against in light of the fact that they by one way or another felt agreeable and approves of the present circumstance. In any case, this is incredibly treachery towards the individuals who takes the demonstration of veiling to ensure themselves. Inevitably, the alleged progressively predominant individuals will overwhelm the individuals and hold onto more force against them. Tambudzai, the fundamental character of Nervous Conditions who understands that she would not like to be abused, risen up to remove the cover of veiling to abstain from being persistently persecuted by the more prevalent men throughout her life. Gradually, Tambu is said to lose her way of life as an African as she no longer follows her unique customs but then began to fantasize the West and follows the western culture. 2)The utilization of quietness can be obviously observed in for the most part the senior ladies in Nervous Conditions. Ladies in the story is continually persecuted by the men anyway they didn't decide to battle for their privileges yet stayed quiet and followed whatever the men says. This can prompt the loss of poise of ladies and furthermore human rights. Custom says ladies should just figure out how to be housewives and not get instruction. Investigating this issue, ladies should all stand up and challenge their privileges and that ladies also can work well for the nation with appropriate training. Staying quiet is truly not a decent answer for issues as it will just prompt more prominent issues later on. 3) The topic of subjectivity comprises of thoughts and assessments of an individual and the decision that might want to be made by the individual. Everybody has their own reasoning and conduct and individuals are distinctive regarding that. Persecution is a demonstration that removes people’s thinking and in actuality abusing them with issues that they don’t like. Subjectivity is without a doubt an emotional issue where typically individuals can't address about it. Individuals ought to be offered chances to have their own assessments and not having to indiscriminately follow what others says. On occasion, we may be at the correct side and we do need to voice out if the adversary is in reality wrong. There are particular contrasts between the three ideas yet they really cooperate to shape a solid obstruction that makes individuals dread of voicing out or standing up. The ladies referenced in Nervous Conditions regularly includes the three thoughts that made them unique the men. They needed to follow what the men state and quietly carrying out their alloted responsibilities without expressing a word. This is hard for the ladies as they gradually lose their ways of life as ladies and the possibility of being at equivalent with the men.

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Sexuality and Population Female Agency in The Romance of a Shop - Literature Essay Samples

The Sexuality and Population debate is conspicuous in the plot of the novel The Romance of a Shop by Amy Levy. As the novel expands, the story remains mostly in relation to the main components of the debate, as outlined by Grant Allen and Havelock Ellis. The purpose of female empowerment, however, is motivated by social eugenics for a better population in the historical debate, and is fueled by basic female agency in the novel. Nevertheless, both intentions yield the positive results of more well-rounded offspring through eugenics. Levy shows the positive effects of eugenics with half of the Lorimer sisters: Gertrude and Lucy both have the privilege of birthing children, whom we can predict have a bright future ahead with Lucy’s â€Å"excellent training† and Gertrude’s child, who will inherit â€Å"his father’s scientific tastes, or the literary tendencies of his mother† (193). Meanwhile, the half of the Lorimer sisters who do not scrutinize their s uitors end up fruitless or deceased. While Allen and Ellis maintain that women should be educated and encouraged to assume moral responsibility for their sexuality to promote social eugenics, Levy’s novel encapsulates this argument by developing half of the Lorimer sisters as independent women, with the end goal of pairing them with modern, successful husbands, in contrast with patriarchal husbands. Ellis’ discourse entails that women should â€Å"assume her own moral responsibility,† because â€Å"not what goes into the womb but what comes out of it concerns society.† He argues that when women are granted full jurisdiction over their power of creation and not confined under patriarchal rules, women can pursue their best mate to produce wholesome children. This logic appears plainly in Romance of a Shop as Gertrude and Lucy rely solely on and for themselves to marry with their best choice in husband, not just the first man who shows interest. The result is these sisters producing predictably intelligent, robust offspring who will benefit society, just as their parents have. As for Grant’s argument, education and physical fitness are portrayed as keys to the ultimate woman. The ideal woman is thus created, who will complete the cycle and in turn choose a man who helps her produce children free of defects. When woman becomes enlightened in the mind, bec omes logical, and maintains a healthy body, she will be capable of choosing the man who best compliments her physically as well as mentally. The idea is to not leave mate choice up to chance: an improved woman will naturally choose a better man who will not leave her with defected children. The (physically and mentally) weak example shown in the novel is clearly Phyllis, who becomes depressed and unable to take care of her health after her experience with Darrell, leading to her death. The implication is that this woman, who is still portrayed as a child herself, would not be able to create any sort of prosperous offspring of her own, especially not with Darrell. Both Allen and Ellis’ debates are woven into the novel in many different elements to produce an overall argument for eugenics. Romance of a Shop’s character system brings the Sexuality and Population debate to life by dividing the characters into two distinct sides to represent the sentiments towards women of the time, and eventually, to show which side is more prosperous in the long run. The first side consists of characters such as Aunt Caroline, Darrell, Marsh, and Russel. These individuals still function within the patriarchal system, as shown when Aunt Caroline vehemently objects to the girls’ idea of running their own shop, Darrell plainly opposes granting respect towards the independent Gertrude, Marsh is unable to function within the household of headstrong women, and Russel only sees Lucy’s value as a woman in terms of her becoming his caretaker and not his equal. The other side of characters includes Gertrude, Lucy, Watergate, and Frank. We understand these individuals as proponents of female agency within the historical debate, and implicitly, social eugenics. These individual s reveal their progressiveness throughout the novel as Gertrude becomes the main beacon of support for her sisters instead of wishing for a man to come marry her to solve their problems, Lucy rejects suitors such as Russel and Fred who prove to be incapable and old fashioned, Watergate aids the Lorimer sisters yet also recognizes them as self-sufficient young women, and Frank marries Lucy for her mind and sovereignty instead of her looks. This group of individuals reveals themselves to be supportive of the futuristic woman who becomes evolved enough to choose the best mate for herself, and eventually future offspring. By crafting these two groups into the pinnacles of each perspective in the historical debate, Levy clearly shows how the independent woman is more successful in the end, as she unites with a more wholesome husband and nurtures children set to thrive in the world. The Sexuality and Population debate also guides the formation of the two ideal women in the novel, Gertrude and Lucy. These sisters not only portray themselves as free women, but show their rational judgement in choice of husband. Though Gertrude initially declines Watergate’s proposal, we can see he is truly a noble, loyal man who is worthy of Gertrude when he comes again to offer her love. Lucy knows she can escape her economic situation by accepting the proposal of either Russel or Fred, but declines because she is not attracted to either of them. She eventually finds true happiness with a man of her choice, Frank, which she would not have achieved if she had taken one of her first two offers. Gertrude and Lucy seem to observe Ellis’ theory that â€Å"It is the concern of the woman herself, and not of society not of any individual, to determine the conditions under which the child shall be conceived.† Neither woman abides to the societal expectations forced up on her, unlike Phyllis and Fanny, and neither woman feels pressure to get married to solve financial woes. The â€Å"conditions† outlined by Ellis are entirely determined by Gertrude and Lucy in their own circumstances, which classifies them as the sacred mothers described in Ellis’ discourse. The Sexuality and Population debate also develops the plot of the novel by juxtaposing the two genders, in terms of seeking a mate. For example, men such as Fred, Russel, Darrell, and Marsh seem to take shots in the dark in choosing their mates. They believe that any woman they propose to would be greatly honored by their offer and accept it. Fred and Russel are genuinely perplexed at their rejection, Marsh only came to claim Fanny because his current wife died, and Darrell clearly only values Phyllis at a physical level. Meanwhile, the females of the novel struggle to find marriageable men and when one is found, such as Frank, he is desired by more than one woman. The sisters (Gertrude and Lucy) again seem to be observing Allen’s words regarding the future of women aiding eugenics, â€Å"You will inevitably find their education has emancipated them.† (255) The sisters have already been freed by their education and training; they are already more free than other women o f the time, for example, Aunt Caroline and Conny, who conform to women’s expectations. This freedom breeds the sisters’ full jurisdiction in picking their mates and because of it, they pick their most compatible mates and birth children like themselves. Because much more emphasis is placed on the women in the novel to choose husbands due to the discrepancy between the number of marriageable men and marriageable women, we see the historical debate taking place as Gertrude and Lucy wait for their optimal choice in husband to propose. Lastly, the Sexuality and Population debate shapes narration overall by placing Gertrude as the third person narrator. For example, if the novel was limited to Fanny’s or Phyllis’ perspectives, the audience would not be exposed to Gertrude’s agenda, which relays Allen and Ellis’ basic thoughts that female agency is required to improve a population. In particular, her progressive thoughts align directly with Ellis’ views regarding women’s jurisdiction over their acts, and how they should not concern the whole community, just the woman. Yet Gertrude notes the irony of this as she laments, â€Å"She was paying the penalty, which her sex always pays one way or another, for her struggles for strength and independence† (pg 191). After Watergate leaving her, for the only time in the book, she sounds rueful of her feminine agency. Yet this sorrow functions in the whole of the plot as Watergate returns and sees her distress, he realizes she yea rns to accept his love. By displaying the innermost thoughts of the most progressive, independent, and ideal woman (as described by Allen and Ellis), Levy is able to advocate for eugenics throughout the novel. Although it seems as if the purpose of Levy’s novel is to show how the sisters are economically and socially independent, she ultimately pairs the two most headstrong women with husbands. Yet this conclusion operates with the Sexuality and Population debate: Gertrude and Lucy are recognized by their husbands to be intelligent, independent women, unlike the typical marriage dynamic of the time, such as the Marshes. These ideal and capable women have successful children, and drastically, the most different sister from the futuristic woman becomes deceased. Romance of a Shop entwines affirmative ideologies from the Sexuality and Population debate to reveal how female agency is a crucial component in building a stronger society. Works Cited Levy, Amy. The Romance of a Shop. Broadview, 2006. Havelock Ellis, from Studies in the Psychology of Sex: Sex in Relation to Society, 1910 From Grant Allen, â€Å"The Girl of the Future,† The Universal Review 7 (1890): 49-64

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Have You Met Cancers Best Friend, Tobacco - 1211 Words

There is an overwhelming epidemic in the United States that some take for granted, with every puff of a cigarette or chew a person puts in their body they are condemning themselves slowly, but surely. The relation between tobacco use and cancer related diseases has been not only been proven by science, but there are even countless warning labels on the actual products with the hope of changing the individual’s mind when and before consuming the product. People pick up these dirty habits in the early stages of their lives, blaming stress or peer pressure as its influence. Regardless if an individual chooses to smoke or use smokeless tobacco products, the effects of both products are both detrimental to one’s health and longevity.†¦show more content†¦That ungodly numbers has been directly correlated with the use of cigarettes and/or second-hand smoke inhalation and the long/short term effects in has on the body. Another common form of tobacco use is smokeless tobacco, more commonly referred to as dip, snuff, or chew. This form of tobacco is very different than a cigarette in a lot of ways, but more similar than one would think. When a â€Å"dipper† places the tobacco is their mouth he or she’s body will absorb the nicotine directly in their bloodstream usually the using the gums as its preferred route of choice. Dip contains nicotine, which is a highly addictive drug that invades or neurological and cardiovascular systems and impedes the user’s way of life and thinking. Smokeless tobacco is more commonly used by the white population in America, predominantly in the southern states and is directly related to Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancer and findings have found that it can contribute to Pancreatic and Esophageal Cancer as well (Stewart 8). The issue with smokeless tobacco is that one can of dip contains the same amount of nicotine as approximately sixty cigarettes, wh ich makes it a much harder habit to break. Studies show that 75% of cancers in the mouth, lips, tongue, throat, nose and larynx are due to smokeless tobacco use (Stewart 8). Although smokeless tobacco is a much less common form of tobacco use, kids participating high school sports are much more prone to its use due to concealment and the lesser price

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Camp, when you hear the word you think of hot dogs Essay Example For Students

Camp, when you hear the word you think of hot dogs Essay , mashmellows, fires, and tents. Unfortunately during WWII the word camp triggered two words, internment, and concentration. Japanese Americans were placed in internment camps. Those who were deemed not superior by the Nazis were placed in concentration camps. Does this mean America was on the same level of Germany? Did the imprisoners even stop to think what the effects of their actions would be?The reason of imprisonment was different for both sides. Both Hitler and Roosevelt felt it was necessary to imprison those people at that time. Hitler desired a superior race. A pure, blonde haired, blue eyed, German race. Roosevelt needed to be sure all security secrets were safe. He did this by gathering the Japanese to were he could watch them. Not only were the reasons of imprisonment different, but so were the methods of doing so. First, Hitler moved families from their homes and into a ghetto. Then, with little or no warning he would have the Gestapo raid the ghettos. Anyone who refused to comply with the Germans or resisted at all were shot on the spot. The luck, or unlucky who survived were either left for the next raid or taken to camps. In the other hemisphere Roosevelt was sending type of eviction letters. The letters were sent to Japanese Americans and stated that they must be ready to leave at a certain date. The Japanese Americans were also urged to sell their belongings before they left. Once brought to the camps they both faced hardships. People of the concentration camps were forced to live in unsanitary conditions. They received little food and what they did get never kept them full. They were put to work in labor areas around the camp or at nearby factories. Despite their hard work they were not paid for what they did. perhaps it was the constant fear that they could be shot at any time that kept them going. The camp conditions for the Japanese Americans were better than in concentration camps but not acceptable. They received food everyday but just enough to survive. They were able to work hard labor for low wages. They also received medical attention but just enough so epidemics wouldnt spread. They were housed with other families, often in one room. The conditions of the camp were decent but not overly acceptable. In both cases conditions could have been worse, as hard as that is to believe. Although the concentration camps were a higher extreme than the internment camps they both left a mark on history. No matter how big the mark left on history was it cant be greater than the mark left on the hearts of the people that lived it first hand. Peoples human rights were violated and should have never happened. Could there have been alternatives to the route the captors took? We are able to look back now and say that they were wrong but, you probably had to be there.

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Universe And Solar System Essays - Physical Cosmology, Physics

Universe And Solar System The two most common beliefs of the formation of the Universe and Solar System are The Expanding Universe Theory and The Big Bang. There are some comparisons between the two and some contrasts. Almost all astronomers believe that the universe is expanding although they may have different theories on how this is happening. The Expanding Universe Theory is based on the Doppler Effect, the redshift of different galaxies and the assumption of the Hubble Law. The Doppler effect occurs when a wave-emmitting object moves toward or away from an observer and the sound has a change in pitch as the object continues to move. For example the sound a police car siren when it comes from behind and passes you. The redshift of different galaxies is the change or shift in the light radiated by an object such as a star of galaxy that indicates the objects motion. Scientists have used redshifts to measure the speed and direction of distant galaxies. The Hubble law showed that the further away the galaxies were the higher the redshift was, that means the more distant galaxies were moving away at a much faster velocity than those closer to us. The Expanding Universe theory is merely an assumption by astronomers that all the galaxies in the universe are moving away from the earth. The more distant the galaxy the faster it's moving away from us. According to the Big Bang theory a gigantic explosion created the universe billions of years ago. It appeared that the universe we now see could be the remnants of an enormous explosion of the distant past.

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Accidental Hero Distorts the truth essays

Accidental Hero Distorts the truth essays The film Accidental Hero shows that the media distorts the truth. Discuss: The film Accidental Hero distorts the truth in a number of ways, both intentionally and unintentionally. The distortion by the media is mostly unintentional and throughout the duration of the movie a lie told by John Bubber, one of the main characters in Accidental Hero, is the foundation of the untruth. It is this lie that creates the underlying theme in the movie, that there is a time and a place to be completely truthful. There are three main intentional distortions of truth found in the movie. Firstly when John Bubber visits the hospital, secondly when John Bubber and Bernie Le Plante are sitting on a ledge above the city and thirdly when Bernie Le Plante is in a bar and a news reporter on the TV above his head claims several untruths. The lie told by John Bubber gave the media a way to create a superficial hero, through this they gained enormously in ratings which then led to a huge gain financially. Furthermore to improve their ratings even more they offered a 1 million dollar reward for the hero to come forward and participate in an interview. From then on more and more lies were told and all as a result of the lie told by John Bubber. Therefore this then proves that John Bubbers lie was the foundation of the untruth. The media and public are both partly responsible for the distortion of the truth. Though throughout the whole film only three intentional distortions by the media were found, thus saying that most of the films distortions were done unintentionally. One example of an intentional distortion carried out by the media was when John Bubber went to visit a badly blind boy at a childrens hospital and the day after the boy made a miraculous recovery. The media used this to their advantage, saying that John Bubber created a miracle when really they knew full well that it was just a coincidenc ...